← Back To Navigation

The Immigration Variable: A Strategic Assessment of Systemic Benefit and Manufactured Crisis

Introduction: The Maximiser-Minimiser Conflict Over National Prosperity

The discourse surrounding immigration in Western liberal democracies has become one of the most contentious and defining political battlefields of the 21st century. The debate is often framed as a binary choice between economic necessity and cultural preservation, between humanitarian ideals and national security. This report posits that this framing is a strategic deception. The central hypothesis under examination is that immigration is, in its fundamental state, a net positive force for national prosperity, and that the array of problems commonly attributed to it—economic strain, social fragmentation, and rising crime—are not inherent consequences of population mobility but are, in fact, the direct results of systemic policy failures. These failures are then conveniently and deliberately blamed on immigrants, who serve as a politically expedient scapegoat for the shortcomings of incumbent leadership.

This analysis will move beyond a conventional left-right political spectrum to assess the issue through a strategic lens, conceptualizing the conflict as a struggle between two diametrically opposed vectors of thought and action.1

Within this framework, the intensity and persistent illogicality of the anti-immigration debate can be understood as a key diagnostic indicator—a political "hum".2 A disproportionate, fear-based, and evidence-resistant reaction to a demonstrably beneficial policy (a Maximiser action) signals the presence of a sophisticated Minimiser influence campaign. This campaign is not merely a debate over policy minutiae; it is a strategic war for the allegiance of the vast, uncommitted majority of the population, termed 'The Compliant', whose passive alignment will ultimately determine the nation's trajectory.2

This report will systematically test the core hypothesis through a multi-stage analysis. It will begin with a theoretical thought experiment—a 20-person village—to model the mechanical relationship between population growth, infrastructure, and policy choices, illustrating how mismanagement, not population increase, is the root cause of systemic collapse. It will then proceed to a quantitative assessment of the empirical evidence for immigration's manifold benefits. Following this, the report will deconstruct the common narratives of the Minimiser vector, exposing their strategic structure and refuting them with evidence. Finally, it will analyze real-world case studies of nations that have pursued restrictive immigration policies, examining the long-term consequences of this strategic path. The report will conclude with a synthesis on the primacy of policy, arguing that the negative outcomes associated with immigration are not inevitable failures but deliberate political choices.

Part I: The Village Analogy - A Microcosm of Systemic Integrity and Collapse

To isolate the variables of population growth, resource management, and policy, it is instructive to begin with a simplified, closed-system model. This thought experiment of a small village is designed to demonstrate mechanically that societal strain is not an intrinsic property of adding new people, but a direct and predictable consequence of failing to adequately plan for them. The model reveals the fundamental relationship between population, infrastructure, and the political narratives that emerge from the success or failure of governance.

Initial State (Year 0): The 20-Person Village

The model begins with a self-sufficient village of 20 people (N=20). Its sustainability is defined by its resources and the infrastructure used to manage them.5

The Maximiser Policy Path: Proactive Investment

The village leadership, anticipating future growth either from births or the arrival of newcomers, can adopt a Maximiser strategy. This approach views population growth not as a threat, but as an opportunity to increase the village's labor pool, productive capacity, and overall resilience.9 It is a policy of planned change, based on the principle that the best way to predict the future is to create it.9

The Minimiser/Neglect Policy Path: Reactive Mismanagement

Alternatively, the village leadership can be neglectful or adopt a Minimiser strategy of inaction and short-term thinking. They may view the surplus as a permanent condition to be enjoyed, not a temporary opportunity to be invested.

Redefining "Carrying Capacity" for Human Systems

This model reveals a critical flaw in applying a purely ecological concept of carrying capacity to human societies. In ecology, K is largely a static environmental constant.6 For human systems, however, policy, technology, and infrastructure investment make K a dynamic variable, K(t).7 A society's sustainability is therefore not a simple question of its population size (N) relative to K. The more critical metric is the relationship between the rate of change of its population (dN/dt) and the rate of change of its carrying capacity (dK/dt). A crisis does not occur when N approaches K, but when dN/dt outpaces dK/dt for a sustained period due to a lack of foresight and investment. This reframes the problem entirely: a population crisis is, by definition, a crisis of inadequate planning and resource management. It is a policy failure.

Scapegoating as a Symptom of Governance Failure

The village model also demonstrates that the emergence of anti-immigrant sentiment is not an organic or inevitable response to population pressure. It is a calculated political strategy deployed by a failing leadership to manage its own political risk. In the neglect scenario, the leadership is directly culpable for the resource shortage. Accepting this responsibility is politically dangerous. The arrival of a distinct, identifiable subgroup—the newcomers—offers an opportunity to externalize blame. By framing the newcomers as the cause of the problem, the leadership transforms its own failure of foresight into an external threat, a manufactured crisis that justifies its position as the community's protector.2 Therefore, the rise of potent anti-immigrant narratives should be treated as a primary indicator of severe governance failure. It is a symptom of a leadership that has chosen to manage public perception through division and fear rather than managing national resources through competent planning and investment.

Part II: The Maximiser Case for Immigration - A Quantitative Assessment of National Benefits

The theoretical benefits of population growth modeled in the proactive village are not merely abstract concepts; they are borne out by a vast and consistent body of empirical evidence from the world's leading economic and policy institutions. This section consolidates this evidence to establish the quantitative basis for the Maximiser case: that immigration, when managed by competent policy, is a powerful engine of economic growth, a guarantor of fiscal sustainability, a source of labor market resilience, and a necessary antidote to demographic decline.

Section 2.1: Macroeconomic Engine of Growth

Immigration's most direct and significant impact is on the expansion of the host country's economy. By increasing both the labor supply and consumer demand, immigrants drive growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and enhance productivity.

Section 2.2: Fiscal Health and Sustainability

Contrary to the narrative of immigrants being a drain on public resources, the broad consensus of fiscal analysis shows that they are, on average, net contributors to public coffers over their lifetimes.

Section 2.3: Labor Market Dynamics and Resilience

Immigration provides a crucial mechanism for labor markets to adapt to economic changes and demographic shifts, filling shortages and complementing the native-born workforce.

Section 2.4: Demographic Resilience and Rejuvenation

For the aging societies of the developed world, immigration is not merely an economic benefit but a demographic necessity.

The following table summarizes the broad consensus on the positive impacts of immigration across key economic and demographic metrics.

Metric Key Finding Primary Sources
GDP Impact Positive; a 1% point increase in immigrant flow relative to employment raises output by nearly 1% over five years. "IMF 19, World Bank 20, CBO 21"
Productivity "Positive; driven by innovation, entrepreneurship, and labor market specialization." "IMF 19, NBER 23, OECD 34"
Net Federal Fiscal Impact Net positive over lifetime; immigrants pay more in federal taxes than they receive in benefits. "CBO 30, NAS 29, AEI 29"
State/Local Fiscal Impact "Can be a net cost in the short-term, primarily due to public education for immigrants' children." "CBO 51, AEI 29, Wharton 33"
Innovation/Patenting Disproportionately high; immigrants are 16% of inventors but produce ~25% of innovation output. "NBER 23, American Immigration Council 26"
Entrepreneurship Rate Higher than native-born population; 46% of Fortune 500 companies founded by immigrants or their children. "NBER 24, American Immigration Council 26"
Native Wages & Employment Negligible impact on average; most studies find effects clustering around zero. "AEA 38, CEPII 39, IZA 41"
Old-Age Dependency Ratio Improves ratio by increasing the size of the working-age population relative to retirees. "IMF 47, World Bank 48"

The Jurisdictional Mismatch of Costs and Benefits

A critical structural issue emerges from this data: a fundamental misalignment in how the costs and benefits of immigration are distributed across different levels of government. The costs, such as providing K-12 education for the children of new immigrants and initial healthcare services, are immediate, tangible, and borne primarily by state and local governments.28 In contrast, the most significant benefits—such as higher income and payroll tax revenues that ensure the long-term solvency of federal programs like Social Security and Medicare, sustained GDP growth, and increased innovation—are diffuse, accrue over the long term, and flow primarily to the federal government.22

This jurisdictional mismatch creates a profound political vulnerability. A local mayor or school board member sees only the immediate strain on their budget and services. A national policymaker, examining the data, sees the long-term benefit to the federal balance sheet and the national economy. Minimiser narratives thrive in this gap. They can point to a genuinely overcrowded local school and blame immigrants, while conveniently ignoring the fact that the taxes paid by those immigrants' parents are helping to keep the national pension system from collapsing. This is not a failure of immigration, but a failure of fiscal federalism. A competent, Maximiser-oriented government would address this by implementing federal-to-state fiscal transfers designed to offset these initial, localized costs. Such a policy would align local and national interests, support successful integration, and neutralize one of the Minimiser vector's most potent and deceptive talking points.

Immigration as a Catalyst for Native Specialization and Productivity

The data also reveals a more sophisticated dynamic in the labor market than the simplistic model of direct competition suggests. Rather than simply displacing low-skilled native workers, the arrival of immigrants often acts as a catalyst for occupational upgrading and specialization among the native-born workforce, leading to overall productivity gains. The simple model assumes immigrants and natives are perfect substitutes, which would inevitably lead to wage depression.42 However, the consistent empirical finding of a negligible wage effect points to a different reality.38

The evidence indicates that immigrants and natives are often imperfect substitutes.28 Native-born workers, particularly in the low-skill category, possess a significant comparative advantage in communication- and language-intensive tasks. When an influx of immigrants fills roles that are more reliant on manual labor, it creates an incentive and an opportunity for native workers to shift into complementary, higher-value positions. A native construction worker may become a foreman, supervising crews; a native farmhand may move into a sales or logistics role that requires fluent language skills.28 This process of specialization makes the entire production process more efficient, raising total factor productivity. In this more accurate model, immigration is not merely adding labor to the economy; it is actively restructuring the labor market in a way that enhances the productivity and, in the long run, the wages of native workers.

Part III: The Minimiser Vector - Deconstructing the Narrative of Threat

The overwhelming empirical evidence for immigration's benefits stands in stark contrast to the political discourse in many nations. This disconnect is not accidental. It is the result of a persistent and sophisticated strategic campaign by Minimiser actors to frame immigration as a multifaceted threat. This section will systematically deconstruct the three primary pillars of this campaign—the myths of economic burden, the criminal alien, and cultural disintegration—by applying the 'Delusion' framework to expose their strategic architecture and refuting them with established facts.1

Section 3.1: The Myth of the Economic Burden

This is perhaps the most common and politically potent anti-immigration narrative. It leverages the genuine economic anxieties of the native population to create a false causal link between immigrants and economic hardship.

Section 3.2: The Myth of the Criminal Alien (Securitisation)

This narrative seeks to transform the immigrant from an economic competitor into a physical threat, a far more powerful emotional trigger for mobilizing public opinion.

Section 3.3: The Myth of Cultural Disintegration

This narrative is more insidious, playing on anxieties about national identity and the pace of social change.

The following table deconstructs these common narratives using the 'Delusion' framework, summarizing their strategic components and providing a direct empirical refutation.

Narrative The Bait (Emotional Hook) The Cover (Moral Justification) The True Intent (Strategic Goal) Empirical Refutation (Source)
Economic Burden "Anxiety over taxes, wage stagnation, and cost of public services." """Protecting our welfare state for hardworking citizens.""" Scapegoat immigrants for systemic fiscal issues and underfunding of services; mobilize voters on economic anxiety. Net positive lifetime fiscal impact.29 Immigrants are major contributors to Social Security/Medicare.31
Criminal Threat "Fear of crime and terrorism, amplified by anecdotal cases." """Maintaining law and order and protecting national security.""" "Securitize the issue to bypass rational debate and justify extraordinary state powers (e.g., border walls, mass deportation)." "Immigrants, including undocumented, have significantly lower crime and incarceration rates than native-born citizens.64"
Cultural Disintegration Anxiety about rapid cultural change and loss of national identity. """Defending national values, heritage, and social cohesion.""" "Leverage ethno-nationalist sentiment by creating an ""us vs. them"" dichotomy; define national identity in exclusionary terms." "Socio-economic deprivation, not diversity, is the primary driver of low social cohesion. Diversity can have positive effects.72"

The Normalization of Extremism

A dangerous third-order effect occurs when mainstream political parties, fearing a loss of votes to the far-right, begin to adopt and legitimize Minimiser rhetoric. This was observed in the UK, where the Labour party's rightward shift on immigration was analyzed, and in Germany, where the center-right CDU began cooperating with the far-right AfD on immigration-related votes.56 Research shows this strategy is electorally self-defeating: it fails to win over committed anti-immigrant voters, who see it as inauthentic and prefer the original far-right party, while simultaneously alienating the mainstream party's own progressive base.56

The more pernicious consequence, however, is the impact on the political environment. When radical-right, nativist, and illiberal ideas are echoed by supposedly centrist voices, they become normalized.55 This process shifts the "Overton Window"—the range of ideas the public is willing to consider and accept as legitimate. The constant repetition of this rhetoric by mainstream actors sanitizes it, making previously extremist positions seem reasonable. This provides a gateway to more violent forms of extremism by creating a fertile recruitment ground, as demonstrated by the convergence of mainstream anti-immigration protestors and neo-Nazi groups at the 'March for Australia' rallies.3 The mainstream Minimiser does not defeat the extremist; they till the soil in which extremism grows.

The "Threat" Narrative as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

The Minimiser narrative of cultural threat often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, engineered by the very policies enacted to "prevent" it. The narrative claims that certain immigrant groups will fail to integrate, will not learn the language, and will form isolated, parallel societies that threaten social cohesion.52 To preempt this supposed threat, governments implement restrictive policies that bar immigrants from legal employment, limit their access to education and social services, and keep them in a state of perpetual legal precarity.74

These policies do not prevent non-integration; they actively cause it. By creating insurmountable barriers to economic and social participation, they force immigrants into informal, underground economies and marginalized communities. This enforced segregation and exclusion is then cynically pointed to as "proof" that the immigrants were unassimilable from the outset, thus justifying the initial prejudice and calls for even harsher policies. This is a perfect feedback loop of manufactured justification.2 The policy intentionally creates the very problem it claims to be solving, trapping immigrants in a cycle of exclusion that is then used as evidence to validate the racist premise of the original narrative.

Part IV: Case Studies in Restriction - The Long-Term Consequences of the Minimiser Path

The theoretical collapse of the mismanaged village and the strategic deceptions of the Minimiser vector are not confined to abstract models. History and contemporary geopolitics provide stark, real-world examples of nations that have chosen a path of immigration restriction. These case studies serve as empirical validation of the report's central hypothesis, demonstrating that a sustained Minimiser strategy leads not to security and prosperity, but to demographic decline, economic stagnation, and social fragility.

Section 4.1: Japan - The Demographic Winter

Japan stands as the world's foremost cautionary tale regarding the long-term consequences of a successful, decades-long Minimiser policy. Its experience illustrates the logical endpoint of prioritizing a perceived ethnic homogeneity over demographic and economic vitality.

Section 4.2: Hungary - The Nationalist Paradox

Hungary under the government of Viktor Orbán provides a different but equally instructive case study. Here, the Minimiser strategy is deployed not in response to a real immigration influx, but as a tool for internal political consolidation and external geopolitical posturing.

Section 4.3: United States - The Legacy of Exclusion

The history of the United States offers powerful examples of both the costs of restriction and the benefits of liberalization.

The following table provides a stark quantitative comparison of the divergent outcomes between countries that have followed a Minimiser path (Japan, Hungary) and a benchmark nation that has historically pursued a Maximiser, high-immigration model (Australia).

Indicator Japan (Minimiser Path) Hungary (Minimiser Path) Australia (Maximiser Path Benchmark) Sources
Population Growth (2010-2023) -2.8% -3.1% +18.2% 3
Foreign-Born Population % (2023) 2.2% 6.2% 30.1% 3
Old-Age Dependency Ratio (Proj. 2060) 73.8% 51.5% 43.1% "82, OECD Data"
Fertility Rate (2023) 1.26 1.51 1.63 "82, World Bank"
"Patents (per million people, 2022)" "1,569" 134 557 "WIPO, World Bank"

Note: Patent data reflects overall innovation culture; while not solely due to immigration, it correlates with the economic dynamism that high-immigration countries exhibit.

The "Demographic Death Spiral" as a Minimiser Endpoint

The case of Japan provides a chilling glimpse into the logical conclusion of a sustained Minimiser strategy: a "demographic death spiral." By choosing to prioritize an ideology of ethnic purity over national vitality, the country has entered a self-reinforcing cycle of decline. The initial policy of restricting immigration leads to a shrinking workforce and an aging population. This demographic drag causes economic stagnation and reduces opportunities for the young. Economic pessimism and the high cost of living, in turn, create powerful disincentives for family formation, further depressing the national fertility rate. This creates a vicious feedback loop: fewer young people today means an even smaller workforce and a more skewed dependency ratio tomorrow, leading to further economic strain and an ever-deepening demographic crisis. This trajectory, if left unaltered, leads to systemic insolvency, a decline in national power, and a steady erosion of living standards. It is the collapse of the mismanaged village, playing out in slow motion on a national stage.

The Inversion of the Scapegoat Mechanism

In Hungary, the anti-immigration narrative serves a more complex and inverted strategic purpose. It is not merely a tool to blame an external group for internal problems; it is a mechanism to create a fictional external crisis to justify the consolidation of internal political power and to build a new, illiberal geopolitical axis. Unlike countries that experienced large, sustained inflows of migrants, Hungary has primarily been a country of transit and, more importantly, emigration.87 The "migrant crisis" was largely a manufactured political event, amplified and securitized by the state. The Orbán government then leveraged this manufactured crisis not just for domestic political consumption, but as a foreign policy tool to directly challenge the liberal, cooperative order of the European Union. This strategy positions Orbán as a defender of "European civilization" against a supposed foreign invasion, allowing him to forge a coalition of like-minded Minimiser governments. In this context, the immigrant is not just a scapegoat for domestic policy failures, but a pawn in a much larger geopolitical strategy to reshape the European political landscape away from Maximiser principles of openness and cooperation and towards Minimiser principles of exclusion, securitization, and nationalist sovereignty.

Part V: The Primacy of Policy - Is Failure an Option or a Choice?

The synthesis of the theoretical model, the quantitative data, and the real-world case studies leads to a final, decisive conclusion about the nature of immigration-related problems. This section will address the final component of the initial hypothesis: whether negative outcomes are fundamentally impossible outside of blatant mismanagement, or if immigration can be truly detrimental even with competent policy.

Acknowledging Legitimate Policy Challenges

To argue that all problems are policy failures is not to argue that large-scale immigration is a frictionless process devoid of challenges. Acknowledging these challenges is critical for a credible analysis and for designing effective policy. The evidence indicates several areas where population inflows create genuine, though manageable, administrative and fiscal pressures.

Framing Challenges as Policy Problems, Not Immigrant Problems

The critical distinction lies in how these challenges are framed and addressed. They are not inherent flaws of immigration itself, but are standard, predictable problems of public administration, resource allocation, and infrastructure planning that any growing society must manage. The strategic orientation of the government—Maximiser or Minimiser—determines whether these challenges are treated as problems to be solved or as opportunities to be exploited.

A Maximiser government views these challenges as investments with exceptionally high long-term returns. It recognizes that spending on education for an immigrant child today creates a high-earning taxpayer tomorrow. It understands that investing in language training unlocks the full productive potential of a new worker. Consequently, it would implement a suite of proactive policies:

A Minimiser government, in contrast, operates from a different strategic logic. It sees these friction points not as administrative problems to be solved, but as invaluable political opportunities. It will therefore deliberately underfund social services, refuse to reform restrictive zoning laws, and neglect infrastructure investment. This allows pressure to build on schools, hospitals, and the housing market, manufacturing a visible and painful crisis.2 This manufactured crisis then becomes the "evidence" used to justify an anti-immigrant political agenda, scapegoating the newcomers for the very scarcity the government's inaction created.

The Final Verdict on the Hypothesis

The full weight of the evidence presented in this report leads to a comprehensive validation of the initial hypothesis.

The True "Cost" of Immigration is the Cost of Mismanagement

The public debate is often deliberately misframed around the "cost" of immigration. The direct fiscal costs are manageable, temporary, and are dwarfed by the immense long-term fiscal and economic benefits. The true, catastrophic costs are not incurred by accepting immigrants, but by adopting a Minimiser strategy of rejecting them. The real cost is not the line-item expense of educating an immigrant child in a public school.33 The real cost is the decades of lost GDP growth, the demographic death spiral, the insolvent pension systems, and the erosion of national vitality that result from exclusionary policies, as starkly illustrated by the case of Japan.84 From a long-term strategic perspective, a policy of restriction is fiscally and economically reckless. The "problem" is not the expense of investment, but the far greater, generational cost of failing to invest.

Immigration Policy as a Litmus Test for Governance Quality

Ultimately, a nation's approach to immigration serves as a powerful litmus test for its overall quality of governance and strategic foresight. To manage immigration successfully—to harness its immense benefits while mitigating its manageable challenges—requires the core competencies of effective statecraft: long-term planning, a commitment to evidence-based policy, and the political courage to prioritize long-term national interest over short-term political gain.

A government that defaults to a Minimiser strategy—relying on scapegoating, fear-mongering, and reactionary crisis management—is signaling a fundamental incapacity for complex, forward-looking governance. As the case of Hungary suggests, this approach often correlates with a broader decay of democratic institutions and a turn towards authoritarianism.87 The immigration debate, therefore, is about far more than immigration. It is a proxy battle for the fundamental character of the state: a contest between a rational, problem-solving, Maximiser model of governance and a cynical, power-hoarding, Minimiser model.

Conclusion: A Strategic Crossroads

This report set out to test the hypothesis that immigration is a fundamental good, and that its associated ills are the product of policy failures deliberately weaponized for political gain. The comprehensive analysis of theoretical models, quantitative economic and demographic data, and real-world national case studies validates this hypothesis in its entirety.

The evidence demonstrates that immigration is a powerful Maximiser vector, consistently driving economic growth, ensuring fiscal solvency, fostering innovation, and providing the demographic vitality necessary to sustain the aging societies of the developed world. The consensus of credible, mainstream research is not ambiguous; it is overwhelming.

Conversely, the problems of social friction, economic strain, and resource scarcity are not intrinsic to the arrival of new populations. They are the direct and predictable outcomes of Minimiser policies of neglect and mismanagement. The failure to invest in infrastructure, to create a functional and responsive legal immigration system, and to address the jurisdictional mismatch of costs and benefits is what manufactures crisis. The subsequent act of blaming immigrants for this manufactured crisis is a deliberate and cynical political strategy—a 'Greater Lie' designed to consolidate power by fostering division and fear.

The case studies of nations that have pursued a restrictive path, such as Japan and Hungary, serve as a stark warning. The long-term consequences are not strength and cohesion, but economic stagnation, demographic collapse, and a hollowing out of national potential. The true cost of immigration is not the cost of welcoming new people, but the staggering opportunity cost of turning them away.

Nations today stand at a strategic crossroads. One path, the Maximiser path, is defined by a rational, evidence-based approach to managed openness. It treats policy challenges as problems to be solved and views immigrants as co-creators of future prosperity. The other path, the Minimiser path, is defined by a reactionary, fear-based politics of exclusion. It treats policy challenges as opportunities to be exploited and views immigrants as scapegoats for past failures.

The choice is not merely about immigration policy. It is a fundamental choice about the nature of governance and the future trajectory of the nation-state. It is a choice between a future of dynamism, growth, and resilience, and one of stagnation, decline, and self-inflicted decay. As per the logic of the Psochic Hegemony, it is the choice between striving for the 'Greater Good', which creates new value for all, and succumbing to 'The Greater Lie', which destroys collective value for individual political gain.1 The evidence presented in this report makes it clear which path aligns with a strategy for enduring national success.

Works cited

  1. A Framework for the Judgment of Ideas
  2. The Minimisation Plan: An Investigative Primer
  3. The Politicisation of Immigration in Australia (1990-Present): A Strategic Assessment of Minimiser Narratives and Actors
  4. Standard Operating Procedures for Investigating the Minimisation Plan
  5. Community Based Natural Resources Management - World Neighbors, accessed September 28, 2025
  6. Carrying capacity - Wikipedia, accessed September 28, 2025
  7. 5.2: Carrying Capacity - Biology LibreTexts, accessed September 28, 2025
  8. Carrying capacity | Population Dynamics, Ecosystems & Environment - Britannica, accessed September 28, 2025
  9. The Secrets of Successful Small Communities | New Hampshire Municipal Association, accessed September 28, 2025
  10. Tools and Resources for Sustainable Communities | US EPA, accessed September 28, 2025
  11. Resource management — what it is, and why it's important for your business, accessed September 28, 2025
  12. What is Resource Management and Why Is It Important? - Planview, accessed September 28, 2025
  13. (PDF) Economic Growth and Population Models - ResearchGate, accessed September 28, 2025
  14. Societal collapse - Wikipedia, accessed September 28, 2025
  15. The meaning of collapse from past to present - Scholarly Review Journal, accessed September 28, 2025
  16. Overexploitation of Renewable Resources by Ancient Societies and the Role of Sunk-Cost Effects, accessed September 28, 2025
  17. Smart Growth in Small Towns and Rural Communities | US EPA, accessed September 28, 2025
  18. Building Rural Infrastructure - Blueprint for Rural Policy Action in the States, accessed September 28, 2025
  19. The Macroeconomic Effects of Large Immigration Waves, WP/23/259 ..., accessed September 28, 2025
  20. Migration & Remittances Overview: Development news, research, data | World Bank, accessed September 28, 2025
  21. Explainer: Immigrants and the U.S. Economy | migrationpolicy.org, accessed September 28, 2025
  22. Effects of the Immigration Surge on the Federal Budget and the Economy, accessed September 28, 2025
  23. The Outsize Role of Immigrants in US Innovation | NBER, accessed September 28, 2025
  24. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES IMMIGRANT ENTREPRENEURS AND INNOVATION IN THE U.S. HIGH-TECH SECTOR J. David Brown John S. Earle Mee J, accessed September 28, 2025
  25. Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Innovation in the US High-Tech Sector | NBER, accessed September 28, 2025
  26. New Data: Immigrants Keep Economy Strong, As Congress Considers Wasting Billions on Mass Deportation, accessed September 28, 2025
  27. Effects of Immigration on Entrepreneurship and Innovation - Cato Institute, accessed September 28, 2025
  28. The Effects of Immigration on the United States' Economy - Congress.gov, accessed September 28, 2025
  29. The Fiscal Impact of Immigration: An Update - American Enterprise ..., accessed September 28, 2025
  30. Effects of the Immigration Surge on the Federal Budget and the Economy, accessed September 28, 2025
  31. Debunking the Lies Politicians Say About Immigrants - Vera Institute, accessed September 28, 2025
  32. The Lifetime Fiscal Impact of Immigrants - Manhattan Institute, accessed September 28, 2025
  33. The Effects of Immigration on the United States' Economy - Penn Wharton Budget Model, accessed September 28, 2025
  34. International Migration Outlook 2024 | OECD, accessed September 28, 2025
  35. Migration and Labour Market Outcomes in OECD Countries, accessed September 28, 2025
  36. OECD job markets remain resilient but population ageing will cause significant labour shortages and fiscal pressures, accessed September 28, 2025
  37. Benefits of Immigration Outweigh the Costs | George W. Bush Presidential Center, accessed September 28, 2025
  38. The Impact of Immigrants on Host Country Wages, Employment and Growth, accessed September 28, 2025
  39. Does Immigration Affect Native Wages? A Meta-Analysis - CEPII, accessed September 28, 2025
  40. A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Effect of Immigration on Wages - Tinbergen Institute, accessed September 28, 2025
  41. Do immigrant workers depress the wages of native workers? | IZA World of Labor, accessed September 28, 2025
  42. THE EFFECTS OF LABOR MARKET COMPETITION WITH IMMIGRANTS ON THE WAGES AND EMPLOYMENT OF NATIVES - Goldman School of Public Policy, accessed September 28, 2025
  43. The Effect of Low‐Skilled Immigration on U.S. Prices: Evidence from CPI Data, accessed September 28, 2025
  44. Slowdown in Immigration, Labor Shortages, and Declining Skill Premia - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, accessed September 28, 2025
  45. Minimum Wages and the Labor Market Effects of Immigration - CEPII, accessed September 28, 2025
  46. Immigration and the Wage Distribution in the United States - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed September 28, 2025
  47. Can Immigration Solve the Demographic Dilemma? – IMF F&D, accessed September 28, 2025
  48. English Text (106.15 KB) - World Bank Open Knowledge Repository, accessed September 28, 2025
  49. Module 4—Demographic Trends across the World and International Migration, accessed September 28, 2025
  50. Policy Research Working Paper 7893 - World Bank Documents, accessed September 28, 2025
  51. Effects of the Surge in Immigration on State and Local Budgets in 2023, accessed September 28, 2025
  52. Opposition to immigration - Wikipedia, accessed September 28, 2025
  53. A Core Narrative for Immigration Messaging - The Opportunity Agenda, accessed September 28, 2025
  54. The instrumentalisation of migration in the populist era, accessed September 28, 2025
  55. Attitudes towards migration and the impact on P/CVE, accessed September 28, 2025
  56. Our research makes it clear: by capitulating to the right, Labour is ..., accessed September 28, 2025
  57. Immigration and the Presidential Election | Tufts Now, accessed September 28, 2025
  58. An analysis of the anti-immigration discourse during the official 2016 Brexit referendum campaign - OpenEdition Journals, accessed September 28, 2025
  59. An Analysis of British Media's Framing of Immigration During Brexit Campaign's Final Days, accessed September 28, 2025
  60. The trail of Trump's (anti-)immigration policies in Europe - Real Instituto Elcano, accessed September 28, 2025
  61. National Rally - Wikipedia, accessed September 28, 2025
  62. Full article: Dismantling the reception of asylum seekers: Hungary's illiberal asylum policies and EU responses - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed September 28, 2025
  63. Immigration and Crime, accessed September 28, 2025
  64. Explainer: Immigrants and Crime in the United States | migrationpolicy.org, accessed September 28, 2025
  65. Immigration, Crime, and Incarceration in Early Twentieth-Century America - PMC, accessed September 28, 2025
  66. Debunking the Myth of the 'Migrant Crime Wave' | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed September 28, 2025
  67. Undocumented Immigrant Offending Rate Lower Than U.S.-Born Citizen Rate, accessed September 28, 2025
  68. The rhetoric of the EU Referendum campaign, accessed September 28, 2025
  69. Understanding Europe's turn on migration - Brookings Institution, accessed September 28, 2025
  70. France's far-right renaissance: a new era of political upheaval in Europe, accessed September 28, 2025
  71. Immigration and the Politics of Social Cohesion - ResearchGate, accessed September 28, 2025
  72. The Impact of Migration on Social Cohesion and Integration - Research Explorer - The University of Manchester, accessed September 28, 2025
  73. Immigration Diversity and Social Cohesion - Migration Observatory - University of Oxford, accessed September 28, 2025
  74. America's Immigration Policy Fiasco: Learning from Past Mistakes - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed September 28, 2025
  75. Why the Legal Immigration System Is Broken: A Short List of Problems | Cato at Liberty Blog, accessed September 28, 2025
  76. Immigration and migration in America: social impact and social response - PubMed, accessed September 28, 2025
  77. Ethnic Hierarchy in the Japanese Economy: Economic Effects of ..., accessed September 28, 2025
  78. Recruiting Immigrant Workers: Japan 2024 | OECD, accessed September 28, 2025
  79. Locked Gates: Japan's Immigration Quandary in the Face of Economic and Demographic Realities - AUC Knowledge Fountain, accessed September 28, 2025
  80. Nation, Immigration, and the Future of Japanese Society - Association for Asian Studies, accessed September 28, 2025
  81. Immigration Systems in Labor-Needy Japan and South Korea Have Evolved—but Remain Restrictive - Migration Policy Institute, accessed September 28, 2025
  82. Demographics of Japan - Wikipedia, accessed September 28, 2025
  83. Improved Immigration: Japan's Solution to Its Population Crisis, accessed September 28, 2025
  84. Why population decline is a growing concern around the world. - Good Authority, accessed September 28, 2025
  85. Immigrants Make Us Stronger: A Case Study of Japan - YWCA Seattle, accessed September 28, 2025
  86. Hungary | migrationpolicy.org, accessed September 28, 2025
  87. Refugees, Asylum and Migration Issues in Hungary - Heinrich-Böll ..., accessed September 28, 2025
  88. No Country for Asylum Seekers? How Short-Term Exposure to Refugees Influences Attitudes and Voting Behavior in Hungary - PMC, accessed September 28, 2025
  89. Demographics of Hungary - Wikipedia, accessed September 28, 2025
  90. Immigration - IOM Hungary - International Organization for Migration, accessed September 28, 2025
  91. Inside Viktor Orbán's Failure to Achieve His Demographic Goal - VSquare.org, accessed September 28, 2025
  92. Migration in Hungary, accessed September 28, 2025
  93. A Century Later, Restrictive 1924 U.S. Immigration Law Has Reverberations in Immigration Debate - Migration Policy Institute, accessed September 28, 2025
  94. Restricting Immigration from Asia and the Pacific, 1870s to 1950s | National Archives, accessed September 28, 2025
  95. www.migrationpolicy.org, accessed September 28, 2025
  96. The Immigration Act of 1924 (The Johnson-Reed Act) - Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations - Office of the Historian, accessed September 28, 2025
  97. How U.S. immigration laws and rules have changed through history ..., accessed September 28, 2025
  98. Fighting a Bleak Future? — Hungary's Response to Demographic Challenges, accessed September 28, 2025
  99. Social effects of group migration between developing countries - PubMed, accessed September 28, 2025
  100. A New Wave of Hate - LULAC, accessed September 28, 2025
  101. Anti-immigrant Rhetoric (Anna Bendrat, MCSU Lublin, Poland), accessed September 28, 2025
  102. The Impact of Far-Right Parties in Europe on EU Immigration Policy, accessed September 28, 2025
  103. Migration Narratives in Europe - Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, accessed September 28, 2025