The Who of the What (The Defined Agent)
The American Agent is defined by the evolution from One White Male to the universal Citizen, a status eventually recognized by Voting. We assert that Presence (The Resident) creates rights, and that the fundamental unit of society is the atomic Individual rather than the class or clan. In the market, the Consumer is king, equating desire with power, while the Creator is protected by intellectual property laws. Yet, the Parent retains biological authority over the child, even as the modern Celebrity threatens to replace character with pure visibility.
| What.Who.Who |
The Citizen
What.Who.Who
|
"The right of citizens... to vote shall not be denied... on account of sex."
19th
Amendment, 1920
This amendment recognized that women were full political persons, not merely civic adjuncts to their husbands. Before this, women could own property and pay taxes but could not participate in choosing those who taxed them. By giving them the vote, the legal Definition of "Who counts" expanded dramatically. This establishes Agency as an evolving category in American law. The definition of a Citizen is not fixed in stone; it grows as moral consciousness expands. We used to define the "Who" as "White Male Landowner"—a tiny fraction of the population. Now it is simply "Person." The "What" (legal status) eventually catches up to the "Who" (humanity), though often after painful struggle. |
| What.Who.Where |
The Resident
What.Who.Where
|
"Taxation without representation is tyranny."
James
Otis. Argument, 1761
Otis's argument established a simple logical chain that would fuel a revolution. If I live here ("Where") and I pay taxes ("What"), I must have a voice ("Who"). You cannot take my money without first asking my opinion on how it will be spent. This establishes Presence as the foundation of Rights. If you participate in the system by being here and contributing, the system owes you a definition—a seat at the table. The "What" of legal status is tied to the "Where" of physical habitation. Residency creates obligation, and obligation creates claims. You cannot extract value from a person while denying them a voice. |
| What.Who.What |
The Individual
What.Who.What
|
"The individual is the one supreme building block of our society."
Dwight
D. Eisenhower. 1957
Eisenhower was explicitly contrasting the American system with Soviet Communism. In Communism, the "Class" or the "State" is the fundamental unit of analysis; in America, the "Person" is the irreducible atom. Society is built upward from individuals, not downward from collectives. This establishes Atomic Individualism as the basic ontology of American politics. We define society one person at a time; the Group is merely a collection of individuals with no independent moral status. The Group has no rights of its own that supersede the rights of the persons composing it. The "What" of legal recognition stops at your skin. Collectives cannot have claims that override individual claims. |
| What.Who.Why |
The Consumer
What.Who.Why
|
"The customer is always right."
Marshall
Field. 1909
Marshall Field built a department store empire on this maxim. It means that the person with the money gets to dictate the terms of the transaction—even reality itself. If the customer says the shirt is blue, for commercial purposes it is blue. This establishes Desire as equivalent to Power in the marketplace. In the market, the Agent is defined primarily by what they want, and that wanting commands resources. The Consumer's whim is elevated to the level of Law—businesses exist to satisfy it, not to educate or correct it. The "Who" becomes the King of the Market, sovereign in the domain of exchange. Commercial democracy replaces political democracy as the arena where preferences are registered. |
| What.Who.How |
The Creator
What.Who.How
|
"To promote the Progress... by securing... exclusive Right to their respective
Writings."
Copyright
Clause, Constitution
The Constitution includes a specific promise to inventors and writers: if you create a new "What" (Book, Machine, Song), you own it for a limited time. Nobody else can copy it without permission. This was radical—ideas had traditionally been communal property. This establishes Intellectual Property as a fundamental American concept. We define the person by their creative output; your ideas belong to you as surely as your land. If you have a good idea, the law protects it with the same force it protects physical property. Your "Mind" becomes your "Estate," a source of wealth and inheritance. The Maker is honored not just morally but legally, with enforceable rights. |
| What.Who.Cause |
The Parent
What.Who.Cause
|
"The child is not the mere creature of the State."
Pierce
v. Society of Sisters, 1925
The State of Oregon tried to eliminate private schools, requiring all children to attend public institutions. The Supreme Court struck down the law, ruling that the Parent, not the Government, has primary authority over how the child is raised. The family predates the state and has prior claims. This establishes Biological Authority as superior to political authority in the domain of child-rearing. The Family is a "What" that is older and deeper than the State—its definition is almost sacred. The government cannot cross the threshold of the family without compelling justification. The Parent is the primary cause of the child's formation. Nature trumps legislation in determining who shapes the next generation. |
| What.Who.Effect |
The Celebrity
What.Who.Effect
|
"In the future, everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes."
Andy
Warhol. 1968
Warhol predicted that fame, which once required genuine achievement, would become a mass commodity that anyone could briefly possess. In the media age, you don't have to be good to be famous; you just have to be seen. The camera confers existence. This establishes Visibility as the new metric of personhood. If you aren't on a screen, do you functionally exist in the modern social order? The Definition of the "Who" becomes "How many people know me?"—a purely quantitative measure. Reputation replaces Character; being known substitutes for being worthy of being known. The Celebrity is defined entirely by the effect they produce on the attention of others. |
The Where of the What (The Context of Definition)
The Context of Definition is divided into the Private Sphere, where the home is a sanctuary, and the Public Square, where ideas compete in a market. The Constitution acts as the supreme anchor, while the Frontier offers a zone of possibility where rules have not yet formed. We treat the economy as an Unregulated Zone (Market) where order emerges from chaos. Meanwhile, the University stands as a protected truth factory, eventually creating the Internet—a virtual 'Where' consisting entirely of code and agreement.
| What.Where.Who |
The Private Sphere
What.Where.Who
|
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects."
4th
Amendment
This amendment creates an invisible "Bubble" around you and your property. Inside your house, the King (now the government) cannot enter without a very good reason, documented in a warrant issued by a judge. The threshold of the home is a legal barrier. This establishes Sanctity of the Home as a foundational American principle. There is a "Where" that is explicitly defined as Private—a zone where the State has no default authority. The government stops at your doorstep unless it can prove otherwise. This definition creates a sphere of absolute personal sovereignty within your four walls. The Home is a castle, and you are the absolute monarch within its boundaries. |
| What.Where.Where |
The Public Square
What.Where.Where
|
"The competition of the market."
Oliver
Wendell Holmes Jr. 1919
Holmes argued in his famous dissent that the best way to find truth isn't for the government to decide what's true, but to let all ideas fight it out in public. He called this the "Marketplace of Ideas"—a space where truth emerges from competition, not decree. This establishes the Arena as the American approach to truth. We define a space where ideas compete openly, testing one another in rhetorical combat. It's a battle zone for definitions, with survivors earning provisional truth-status. We believe the best "What" will win if we let all the "Whats" fight freely. Censorship is suspect because it rigs the contest. |
| What.Where.What |
The Constitution
What.Where.What
|
"This Constitution... shall be the supreme Law of the Land."
Article
VI
This clause establishes that the Constitution is the master document of the legal system. No state law, no city ordinance, no Presidential order, and no act of Congress can override it. It is the Rule that rules all other Rules. This establishes Supremacy as the organizing principle of American law. The Definition of law is Hierarchical—there is one "What" that stands higher than all others. The Constitution acts as the Anchor for the entire legal system, the fixed point from which everything else derives. When laws conflict, the Constitution wins. This creates stability and predictability in a system that otherwise might fragment. |
| What.Where.Why |
The Frontier (Concept)
What.Where.Why
|
"The frontier is the line of most rapid and effective Americanization."
Frederick
Jackson Turner. 1893
Turner argued that the Frontier wasn't just a geographical location; it was a transformative "Process." It was the zone where civilization met wilderness and had to adapt, where Old World habits were stripped away and American habits were forged. The Frontier made us who we are. This establishes The Edge as the definitional zone of American identity. We define ourselves by the open space ahead of us, not by the settled territory behind. The "What" is the Possibility inherent in unmapped terrain. A space where the rules don't apply yet is where we feel most comfortable and most ourselves. The Frontier is the "Where" that generates the "Why." |
| What.Where.How |
The Market
What.Where.How
|
"Laissez-faire."
Let it
be / Let it do
This French phrase became the American economic mantra for over a century. It means "Hands Off"—the government should leave the economy alone to find its own equilibrium. The baker and the buyer will figure out the right price without bureaucratic interference. This establishes the Unregulated Zone as the ideal American economic space. We define a space where the "How" is organic, emergent, unplanned. The Market is a "Where" that runs itself through the spontaneous coordination of millions of individual decisions. We trust the Chaos of the market more than the Order of the central planner. Intervention is the exception, not the rule. |
| What.Where.Cause |
The University
What.Where.Cause
|
"Academic freedom."
1940
Principles
The 1940 Statement on Academic Freedom established that professors should be protected (through tenure) so they can pursue unpopular truths without fear of firing. The University is defined as a place where Truth matters more than Politeness, where inquiry takes precedence over comfort. This establishes the Truth Factory as a protected American institution. We define a specific "Where" whose purpose is to create new definitions, to expand the "What" of human knowledge. The School causes the new "What" to emerge through research and debate. It is a protected zone for thinking, insulated from market pressures and political interference. The cost of this protection is the obligation of honesty. |
| What.Where.Effect |
The Internet
What.Where.Effect
|
"Cyberspace. A consensual hallucination."
William
Gibson. Neuromancer, 1984
Gibson coined the term "Cyberspace" before the Internet as we know it even existed. He described it as a non-physical space that exists only in our shared agreement—a "Where" that isn't really anywhere but is nonetheless real for its inhabitants. This establishes Virtual Reality as a new plane of American existence. We created a "Where" that is pure "Code," consisting entirely of information and defined by protocols. It is a plane of existence where the limitations of the body don't apply—you can be anyone, go anywhere, at the speed of electricity. The Internet defines a new frontier that is infinite and ever-expanding. The old rules about physical space simply don't translate. |
The What of the What (The Core Definitions)
The Core Definitions of the Republic are Democracy (Self-Rule) and Republic (Structured Liberty), ensuring that the majority cannot devour the minority. The essential condition is Liberty, balanced by the axiom of Equality—that no man is born booted and spurred. We protect this through Rights, which are defined as "Negative Liberty" (Restrictions on the State) rather than grants of power. Finally, we ensure Justice through the impersonal authority of Law, creating a balance between order and fairness.
| What.What.Who |
Democracy
What.What.Who
|
"Government of the people, by the people, for the people."
Abraham
Lincoln. Gettysburg, 1863
Lincoln defined a perfect loop in one of history's most famous sentences. The Source of government (By the People), the Object of government (Of the People), and the Beneficiary of government (For the People) are all the same entity. There is no external master; we rule ourselves. This establishes Self-Rule as the core definition of American governance. We are not the subjects of a King; we are simultaneously the rulers and the ruled. The "What" is a closed circuit, with no external authority breaking the loop. The Ruler and the Ruled are the same person, which means sovereignty resides permanently in the citizenry. Democracy is not a gift from above but an inherent condition of legitimate government. |
| What.What.Where |
Republic
What.What.Where
|
"A Republic, if you can keep it."
Benjamin
Franklin. 1787
When asked what the Constitutional Convention had produced, Franklin reportedly answered with this cryptic warning. The key word is "Republic," not "Democracy"—and the key phrase is "if you can keep it." A Republic has rules that protect minorities from majorities. This establishes Structured Liberty as the American political form. In a pure Democracy, 51% can vote to kill the 49%; in a Republic, there are Laws that prevent such tyranny. We define the "What" as a system of Laws, not mere Mob Rule. The "keeping it" part reminds us that a Republic requires constant effort—it is inherently unstable and can decay into despotism if neglected. The Constitution is the structure that constrains the democracy. |
| What.What.What |
Liberty
What.What.What
|
"Give me liberty or give me death!"
Patrick
Henry. 1775
Henry offered a stark binary: Freedom or Death, with nothing in between. Without Liberty, Life is reduced to mere biology—existing without truly living. He declared his preference for death as a free man over survival as a slave. This establishes Liberty as the Essential Condition of American existence. Liberty is not a nice addition to life; it is the Definition of Life worth living. If you aren't free, you aren't fully alive—you're merely surviving. It is the primary Ingredient of the American Soul, the non-negotiable element that makes everything else meaningful. All other goods are worthless if purchased at the price of freedom. |
| What.What.Why |
Equality
What.What.Why
|
"All men are created equal."
Declaration
of Independence, 1776
Jefferson didn't claim everyone is equally strong, smart, or talented—empirically false claims. He said they are *created* equal, referring to their initial moral status or their value in God's eyes. The equality is in the starting conditions and inherent dignity, not in outcomes. This establishes Equal Value as the foundational axiom of American morality. No one is born with a saddle on their back, and no one is born with boots and spurs to ride them. The Definition of a human being is standard—there are no "Super-Humans" with greater inherent worth. This demolishes the aristocratic principle that some bloodlines are inherently superior. Every person enters the world with equal standing before the law and before God. |
| What.What.How |
Rights
What.What.How
|
"Congress shall make no law..."
1st
Amendment
Note the careful syntax: The Amendment doesn't say "The People have the right to speak." It says "Congress shall make no law" restricting speech. The protection is framed as a restriction on government power rather than a grant of citizen power. This establishes Negative Liberty as the American definition of Rights. Rights are defined as "Things the Government Cannot Do," not things the government must provide. It constructs a fence around the "Who" that the State cannot cross. My Right is your Restriction; my freedom to speak is the government's prohibition against silencing me. This framing makes rights pre-political—they exist prior to government, which can only recognize them, not create them. |
| What.What.Cause |
Law
What.What.Cause
|
"A government of laws and not of men."
John
Adams. 1780
Adams articulated the crucial distinction between rule by whim and rule by principle. The King (a Man) is unpredictable and potentially tyrannical; the Law (a Text) is stable, consistent, and fair. We obey the Code, not the Guy wearing the crown. This establishes Impersonal Authority as the American mode of governance. The "What" rules rather than the "Who"—the Law is the King, and everyone including the President is subject to it. This prevents any individual from becoming a Tyrant by making personal power subordinate to textual power. The law applies equally regardless of who wrote it or who enforces it. Personality is replaced by principle as the source of legitimate command. |
| What.What.Effect |
Justice
What.What.Effect
|
"No Justice, No Peace."
Slogan
This chant is not a threat but a structural observation. If the system isn't fair (Justice), it cannot be stable (Peace)—the oppressed will eventually push back. You cannot have lasting Order without underlying Fairness; the two are causally linked. This establishes Balance as the expected effect of proper definition. Justice is the correction of error, the restoration of equilibrium when someone has been wronged. The "What" of a properly functioning system is that it produces fair outcomes. If the "Effect" is systematically unfair, the "What" is broken and needs repair. A system that cannot produce Justice will eventually produce revolt. |
The Why of the What (The Purpose of the Definition)
The Purpose of the Definition is Protection—the government exists to secure rights, not to grant them. We form a Union for Defense against external threats and Order to ensure internal tranquility. The State creates a platform for Prosperity, binding the states into Union to prevent fragmentation. This contract is a gift to Posterity, securing the blessings of liberty for the future. The ultimate goal is that the living may pursue Happiness without interference.
| What.Why.Who |
Protection
What.Why.Who
|
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted."
Declaration
of Independence
Jefferson explains the single purpose for which Government exists: to protect our pre-existing Rights. Government doesn't exist to make us rich, to make us holy, or to make us happy—it exists to be a bodyguard for our natural liberties. This establishes Security as the purpose of political definition. The Purpose of the Definition (the State) is to serve the "Who" (the Citizen), not the other way around. The Government is a tool created by the people for a specific job, and it has no other legitimate function. If it fails to protect rights, it loses its reason for existence. The State is a servant, not a master. |
| What.Why.Where |
Defense
What.Why.Where
|
"Provide for the common defense."
Preamble
One of the primary jobs assigned to the Constitution in its opening sentence. The individual states were too weak to fight Britain or Spain alone; they had watched their weakness nearly cost them the Revolution. They needed to join together to have any hope of survival. This establishes Survival as the spatial purpose of political definition. The "What" creates a protective Shell around the territory. We define ourselves as a Union precisely so we don't get eaten by outside predators. The purpose is to keep the Wolves out, to present a unified front against those who would carve us up. Without common defense, there is no country to have definitions about. |
| What.Why.What |
Order
What.Why.What
|
"Insure domestic Tranquility."
Preamble
Shays' Rebellion—a farmer uprising in Massachusetts—terrified the Founders and demonstrated that pure liberty could collapse into chaos. They realized they needed a government strong enough to keep the peace at home, not just defend against foreign enemies. Too much freedom meant civil war. This establishes Peace as the internal purpose of political definition. The Purpose of the Law is to stop us from killing each other over disputes. Definition creates predictability; we know what the rules are, so we don't have to fight to establish them every day. Order is not the enemy of Liberty but its precondition. Without domestic tranquility, all other rights are merely theoretical. |
| What.Why.Why |
Prosperity
What.Why.Why
|
"Promote the general Welfare."
Preamble
The government should create conditions where people can thrive economically and socially. It doesn't guarantee happiness or success, but it promotes the *welfare*—the general conditions of well-being. This is an active role, not merely a protective one. This establishes Thriving as the aspirational purpose of political definition. The Definition creates a platform upon which citizens can build their lives. The "What" (State) exists to help the economy (Why) grow and the people flourish. Government is not merely a referee but a gardener, cultivating the conditions for prosperity. The goal is not just survival but flourishing. |
| What.Why.How |
Union
What.Why.How
|
"In order to form a more perfect Union."
Preamble
The previous system under the Articles of Confederation was a disorganized mess. The states were bickering, refusing to pay debts, erecting trade barriers against each other. The new Constitution was explicitly designed to bind them tighter, to create a genuine nation from a loose confederation. This establishes Cohesion as the structural purpose of political definition. The Definition acts as Glue, holding the disparate parts together. We define ourselves as "One" so we can act as "One"—with a single foreign policy, a single currency, a single army. The Purpose is to prevent the pieces from falling apart into squabbling fragments. Unity enables everything else. |
| What.Why.Cause |
Posterity
What.Why.Cause
|
"Secure the Blessings of Liberty to... our Posterity."
Preamble
The Founders weren't just writing for themselves; they were writing for their great-grandchildren and beyond. They wanted the "What" to last across generations, to create a structure that would outlive them all. The Constitution is a letter to the future. This establishes The Future as the temporal purpose of political definition. The Definition is a Gift to those not yet born. We act now to protect the "Who" that doesn't exist yet, sacrificing present convenience for future liberty. The Purpose spans through time, binding the living to the unborn in a chain of obligation. We are trustees for posterity, not just beneficiaries of our ancestors. |
| What.Why.Effect |
Happiness
What.Why.Effect
|
"The pursuit of Happiness."
Declaration
Jefferson famously substituted Locke's "Property" for "Happiness," a radical upgrade that expanded the scope of legitimate aspiration beyond mere material acquisition. The goal of life is flourishing—subjective well-being as defined by the individual, not the state. This establishes Joy as the ultimate purpose of political definition. The system is not an end in itself; all the laws and wars and taxes exist so that you get to chase your dream. The "Why" is personal fulfillment, the unique vision of the good life that each person carries. The Effect of good government is that people can pursue their happiness without interference. Everything else is instrumental; happiness is terminal. |
The How of the What (The Process of Definition)
The Process of Definition begins with Voting (Input), turning millions of wills into one decision, and is refined through Debate (Conflict). We allow Amendment (Revision) because the code is living, and respect Protest (Disruption) when the code fails. The State is bound by Due Process (Fairness), ensuring the method is as just as the outcome. We rely on Education to install these definitions in the next generation. Finally, the Press acts to verify that the Government remains honest and accountable.
| What.How.Who |
Voting
What.How.Who
|
"One person, one vote."
Gray
v. Sanders, 1963
The Supreme Court ruled that every vote must weigh the same—you cannot give a rural voter more power than a city voter simply because of where they live. The math must be equal for the process to be legitimate. This seems obvious now but was revolutionary. This establishes Input as the fundamental method of defining the Will of the People. How do we determine what "The People" want? We count their votes. Voting is the mechanism for turning millions of individual opinions into one collective Decision. It is the alchemy that transforms private preferences into public policy. Without equal voting, democracy is merely a slogan. |
| What.How.Where |
Debate
What.How.Where
|
"A house divided against itself cannot stand."
Abraham
Lincoln. 1858
Lincoln wasn't merely stating a fact; he was engaging in a public argument with Stephen Douglas that would define the nation's future. They traveled around Illinois debating the meaning of the country, with crowds listening to hours of sophisticated argument. This establishes Conflict as the spatial method of definition. We define the truth not by decree from above, but by argument in the public square. We let the "What" clash with the "Anti-What," trusting that the friction will produce clarity. The Lincoln-Douglas debates showed America at its rhetorical best. Truth emerges from the collision of opposing views. |
| What.How.What |
Amendment
What.How.What
|
"Two thirds of both Houses."
Article
V
The Constitution uniquely includes instructions on how to change itself. The process is deliberately difficult—requiring super-majorities in Congress and ratification by the states—but it is possible. The code can be rewritten. This establishes Revision as the reflexive method of definition. The Definition isn't final; it contains within itself the mechanism for its own modification. If we realize we were wrong (as we did about Slavery, about women's suffrage, about alcohol prohibition), we can edit the text. The "What" can change its mind through a legitimate process. This prevents the Constitution from becoming a sacred relic that cannot adapt to new circumstances. |
| What.How.Why |
Protest
What.How.Why
|
"The Boston Tea Party."
1773
The Founders didn't just write letters to Parliament; they threw the tea into the harbor. They defined their stance by breaking things, by making a spectacle that could not be ignored. Sometimes polite petition is insufficient. This establishes Disruption as the extra-legal method of definition. Sometimes the "How" must happen outside the official rules. When the Definition is wrong, the Citizen has the right to make noise, to create a crisis that forces the system to respond. Protest is an unofficial amendment process, applying pressure from outside the formal channels. When the system won't listen, you make it impossible to ignore. |
| What.How.How |
Due Process
What.How.How
|
"Without due process of law."
5th
Amendment
The Government can deprive you of life, liberty, or property—BUT only if it follows the proper steps. The 5th Amendment creates a checklist (Charges, Jury, Lawyer, Evidence) that must be completed before the State can act against you. This establishes Fairness as the procedural method of definition. The Method protects the Definition; even a correct outcome reached through an unfair process is illegitimate. The "How" matters as much as the "What"—even if you are guilty, the State must play by the rules to convict you. Due process means that power must be exercised through predictable, reviewable procedures. The process is the protection. |
| What.How.Cause |
Education
What.How.Cause
|
"Education is the key to unlock the golden door."
George
Washington Carver
Carver, born into slavery, became a renowned scientist through the transformative power of education. He saw school as the mechanism of freedom, the technology that converted the unfree into the free. This establishes Installation as the causal method of definition. How do you make a Citizen? You teach them. The School is the factory that stamps the "Definition" of citizenship into the mind of the child. Education is not merely skill transfer but identity formation. Without schools, the values that define America would die with each generation. |
| What.How.Effect |
The Press
What.How.Effect
|
"Newspapers without a government."
Thomas
Jefferson. 1787
Jefferson personally hated the newspapers—they had printed vicious lies about him—but he defended their freedom nonetheless. He understood that without a Watchdog, the Government would inevitably become a Wolf. The free press is the immune system of democracy. This establishes Verification as the feedback method of definition. The Press checks whether the "What" is true, whether the government is doing what it claims to do. It is the feedback loop that corrects error and exposes corruption. It prevents the Definition from becoming a Lie through sheer repetition. Without journalists, power would operate entirely in the dark. |
The Cause of the What (The Source of Definition)
The Source of the Definition is God/Creator (Transcendence), placing rights beyond the reach of kings. We built upon the Heritage of English Law and the Reason of the Enlightenment, motivated by the Grievance of pain under tyranny. The State is formed by Compact (Consent), acknowledging the Nature of physics as the underlying reality. Ultimately, the Definition was ratified by the Force of War, proving that the Definition is backed by the Sword.
| What.Cause.Who |
God/Creator
What.Cause.Who
|
"Endowed by their Creator."
Declaration
Jefferson deliberately placed the Source of rights *outside* the human world—they come from God, from Nature, from something higher than any earthly power. This means no King can take them away, because no King gave them in the first place. This establishes Transcendence as the ultimate source of American definition. The Definition is Divine or Natural, not a human invention. It gives the "What" absolute weight—it is not merely an opinion or a preference but a Fact of the Universe. Rights are discovered, not created; recognized, not granted. This places limits on what any government can legitimately do. |
| What.Cause.Where |
England
What.Cause.Where
|
"To no one will we refuse... justice."
Magna
Carta, 1215
The American Founders copied significant portions of their political philosophy from the English Common Law tradition. Our ideas about Juries, Due Process, Habeas Corpus, and enumerated Rights all descend from centuries of English constitutional struggle. This establishes Heritage as the historical source of American definition. We are children of the English tradition, standing on the shoulders of British history. The "What" grew out of a specific "Where"—Runnymede, where the Barons forced King John to sign the Magna Carta. Our revolution was not a rejection of English liberties but a claim that the King was violating them. We inherited our concept of freedom. |
| What.Cause.What |
Enlightenment
What.Cause.What
|
"The Age of Reason."
Thomas
Paine. 1794
The Founders were intellectuals who had studied Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire, and the classical republicans. They tried to build a government based on Science and Logic rather than on Tradition or Divine Right. The Constitution was an engineering project. This establishes Reason as the philosophical source of American definition. The Source is the Mind, not the Throne. America is an intellectual project dreamed up by smart men sitting in a very specific intellectual moment—the Enlightenment. We are the political experiment of the Age of Reason. The Definition was thought up, debated, revised, and implemented as a conscious artifact. |
| What.Cause.Why |
Grievance
What.Cause.Why
|
"He has refused his Assent to Laws."
Declaration
The Declaration famously lists 27 specific grievances against King George—crimes and abuses that justified the Revolution. We defined our Liberty by cataloging his Tyranny and declaring "Not That." The list of wrongs became the blueprint for rights. This establishes Pain as the experiential source of American definition. The Source of the Definition is the scar left by abuse. We know what Freedom is precisely because we knew what Oppression was. The "What" is a reaction to the "Anti-What"—every right in the Bill of Rights corresponds to an abuse the colonists had suffered. Our freedom is the photo-negative of their tyranny. |
| What.Cause.How |
Compact
What.Cause.How
|
"Covenant and Combine ourselves together."
Mayflower
Compact, 1620
Before the Pilgrims even stepped off their ship, they signed a contract agreeing to create a government from scratch. They weren't commanded by a King; they chose to form a community. The State began with a signature, not a sword. This establishes Consent as the procedural source of American definition. The Source of the State is our Agreement—we aren't ruled by Force but by what we said "Yes" to. The Definition holds because we signed it, because we continued to affirm it. Legitimacy flows upward from the people, not downward from Heaven. The State exists only because we keep agreeing that it should. |
| What.Cause.Cause |
Nature
What.Cause.Cause
|
"The Laws of Nature."
Declaration
Jefferson argued that Freedom is not man-made but natural—like Gravity, it is simply how the universe works. "Man is born free," as Rousseau put it. Liberty is not a gift from government but a fact of biology. This establishes Physics as the ontological source of American definition. The Definition is wired into our biology, into the structure of the cosmos. It is not just a good idea but the Natural Order of things. When we defend freedom, we are aligning ourselves with the way the universe is supposed to work. Tyranny is not just wrong; it is unnatural. |
| What.Cause.Effect |
War
What.Cause.Effect
|
"The God of Armies."
Revolution
Era appeal
We argued with words, petitioned the King, published pamphlets—and ultimately settled the matter with gunpowder and bayonets. The Definition was accepted by the world only after we beat the most powerful Empire on earth. Ideas become real when they are backed by force. This establishes Force as the ultimate cause of definitional reality. Violence caused the Definition to become Real in the world of nations. The "What" is backed by the "Sword"—you can write whatever you want, but the world will only respect it if you can defend it. Might doesn't make Right, but it makes Right *actual*. The Revolution was the birth of the idea in blood. |
The Effect of the What (The Consequence of Definition)
The Consequence of the Definition is the Free Man (Autonomy), a 'Who' that owns itself. This definition aligned the West against the East and produced a high Standard of Living (Materialism), though it risked devolving into a shallow Consumer Culture. The emphasis on rights created a culture of Litigation, where every dispute becomes a legal battle. Yet the ultimate effect is Transformation—a 'More Perfect Union' that is forever unfinished.
The Totality of American Definition establishes a new social contract where the Author of political reality is the citizen, transforming the biological human into a legal entity with inalienable rights. This definition is encoded in our Documents, the sacred texts of the Declaration and Constitution which serve as the operating system for the society, replacing the whims of kings with the rule of law. The definition extends to Society, organizing us into a voluntary association of individuals who interact through the free market and the public square rather than through feudal obligation. The Logic of this definition is federalism, a delicate balance that separates powers to prevent tyranny and protects the minority from the majority. We verify this definition through Enforcement, using the police power and the courts to ensure that the paper rights become actual realities. The Source of this definition is a blend of natural law and historical grievance, a belief that our rights pre-exist the government. Ultimately, the Consequence of this definition is the creation of a free man, a prosperous standard of living, and a perpetual mechanism for amendment, ensuring that the work of defining America is never finished.
| What.Effect.Who |
The Free Man
What.Effect.Who
|
"As he died to make men holy, let us die to make men free."
Battle
Hymn, 1861
The song draws a direct line from Christ's sacrifice to the Union soldier's sacrifice—both are redemptive deaths that produce a higher form of human being. The Result of all the Definition is Freedom; the output of the machine is a Person who owns themselves. This establishes Autonomy as the personal effect of American definition. The "What" produces a unique kind of "Who"—a Free Man who is not the property of any other. This is the point of the entire system. All the laws, the wars, the debates exist to create and protect this self-owning individual. The Definition generates the Defined. |
| What.Effect.Where |
The West
What.Effect.Where
|
"Arsenal of Democracy."
FDR,
1940
Roosevelt defined America as the supply depot for the entire free world during World War II. In doing so, he positioned the United States as the headquarters of "Western" civilization, the leader of a global bloc defined by shared values. This establishes Alignment as the geopolitical effect of American definition. The Definition created a block of allied nations—"The West" versus "The East" in Cold War terms. The "What" (Democracy) defined the "Where" (the free world). America became not just a country but the center of an ideological coalition. Our definitions shaped the geopolitical map of the entire planet. |
| What.Effect.What |
Standard of Living
What.Effect.What
|
"The American Way of Life."
Propaganda
Term
This phrase came to mean "Having Stuff"—a car, a TV, a refrigerator, a suburban house. The Definition of Freedom quietly became the Definition of Comfort, of material prosperity. The abstract value was cashed out in concrete goods. This establishes Materialism as the material effect of American definition. The "What" (Idea) produced "What" (Stuff)—the consequence of Liberty was Wealth. America proved that free markets and free people generate prosperity at unprecedented scale. However, this also meant that freedom was increasingly measured by consumption. The ideal citizen became the successful consumer. |
| What.Effect.Why |
Consumer Culture
What.Effect.Why
|
"Conspicuous consumption."
Veblen.
1899
Veblen observed that Americans buy things not primarily for use but to display status—to show off. The Drive shifted from acquiring things that are good to acquiring things that look expensive. The purpose mutated from Virtue to Status. This establishes Distortion as the motivational effect of American definition. The Definition (Freedom) became the Freedom to Buy, the liberty to consume without limit. The "What" ate the "Why"—the means (purchasing power) became the end. Consumer culture is the shadow side of prosperity, where meaning is sought through acquisition. We became free to want, rather than free to be. |
| What.Effect.How |
Litigation
What.Effect.How
|
"I'll see you in court."
Cultural
Trope
Because we define everything by "Rights," we inevitably fight about everything—in court. We don't settle disputes with a handshake, a duel, or a village elder; we sue. Every disagreement becomes a legal case. This establishes Conflict as the procedural effect of American definition. A society of Rights is inherently a society of Arguments about those rights. The Effect is a legalistic culture where every interaction potentially invokes legal categories. The "What" requires a Lawyer to navigate—you need a specialist to understand your own entitlements. Freedom under law becomes freedom to litigate. |
| What.Effect.Effect |
Transformation
What.Effect.Effect
|
"A more perfect Union."
Preamble
The Preamble doesn't say "Perfect Union"; it says "*More* Perfect Union." The modifier implies that perfection is never achieved, only approached. The project is deliberately, structurally unfinished. This establishes Change as the ultimate effect of American definition. The Definition is a vector, not a point—it is always moving toward something rather than resting in achievement. The "What" is always becoming something else. The American Project is inherently and permanently unfinished. There is no final state, only perpetual improvement toward an asymptote never reached. |